Reconstruction talk:Proto-Germanic/hrabnaz

Regarding this revertion: one problem is, I don't really know whether it is Swedish at all (that is, modern Swedish; in other words, used since the 16th century and onwards), or if it's rather Old Swedish. (And there is yet no entry in the ramn-article.) As it is now, I think it's misleading. flinga (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

The word can be found at the Swedish Wiktionary as a Swedish entry [1] with the labels dated and dialectal. --87.63.114.210 21:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

It should also be noted that words are listed into the etymology trees even if they are archaic. The etymology trees do not reflect the specific use of a certain word (it being rare, archaic, dated, etc.). --87.63.114.210 21:35, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Pronunciation

Shouldn't this be pronounced /ˈxrɑβ.nɑz/? Hrabnaz (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2022 (UTC)