Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/īĺč
Appearance
Proto-Turkic
[edit]Reconstruction Notes
[edit]Clauson notes that Karakhanid form is consistently spelled with an ï, rather than i and its equivalents found in every Turkic language. This irregularity is attributed to it being "perhaps the original form" by the author.
Alternative Reconstructions
[edit]Noun
[edit]*īĺč
Declension
[edit]singular 3) | |
---|---|
nominative | *īĺč |
accusative | *īĺčig, *īĺčni1) |
genitive | *īĺčniŋ |
dative | *īĺčke |
locative | *īĺčde |
ablative | *īĺčden |
allative | *īĺčgerü |
instrumental 2) | *īĺčin |
equative 2) | *īĺčče |
similative 2) | *īĺčleyü |
comitative 2) | *īĺčligü |
1) Originally used only in pronominal declension.
2) The original instrumental, equative, similative, and comitative cases have fallen into disuse in many modern Turkic languages.
3) Plurality in Proto-Turkic is disputed. See also the notes on the Proto-Turkic/Locative-ablative case and plurality page on Wikibooks.
Descendants
[edit]- Arghu
- Oghuz
- Karluk
- Kipchak
- Siberian
References
[edit]- Clauson, Gerard (1972) “i:ş (? ı:ş)”, in An Etymological Dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon Press, page 254
- Räsänen, Martti (1969) Versuch eines etymologischen Wörterbuchs der Türksprachen (in German), Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura, page 174
- Sevortjan, E. V. (1974) Etimologičeskij slovarʹ tjurkskix jazykov [Etymological Dictionary of Turkic Languages] (in Russian), volume I, Moscow: Nauka, pages 395-396
- Starostin, Sergei, Dybo, Anna, Mudrak, Oleg (2003) “*īĺč”, in Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages (Handbuch der Orientalistik; VIII.8)[1], Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill