Module talk:sk-verb

Conjugations

@TomášPolonec, @Benwing2: Hi.

I have filled some major representatives for the verbs defined in this module, although you have two sections for "irreg-stáť". One for stáť, báť sa and one for stáť sa. They use different patterns but use identical names.

@Benwing2, it looks like this could indeed serve as a starter for Czech verbs as well, with appropriate changes.

brať is very different from the Czech brát. E.g. SK 1st pers. sg beriem vs CS beru.

Pity the document can't be converted to text. (Certain, very important or difficult portions could be dumped into Google drive and OCR'ed by Google Docs). Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 11:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@Atitarev, TomášPolonec Thanks! BTW your ping to Tomáš didn't go through. I actually have a partially-written module already, based on the Ukrainian one so it uses similar syntax (along with Wikipedia's division of Czech verbs into classes based on Morphological classification of Czech verbs). The slow part is going through each class and figuring out what the variants are; I've done the verbs in -nout (equivalent to Zaliznyak's class 3 and 3˚) and the verbs in -at with present in -u (somewhat equivalent to Zaliznyak's class 6 and 6˚, although the Czech verbs actually conjugate more like mixed classes like 1a6a and 6a1a) and partly done the verbs like nést and péct (equivalent to Zaliznyak's class 7 and 8). I think all the remainder will be easy. Your suggestion to use OCR on the doc seems like a good one; the alternative is to manually type in the important sections into Google Translate, which is a real pain in the ass. Benwing2 (talk) 13:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@Atitarev: Hi! I am not sure, what you mean. As you can see in the documentation, the irregular verbs stáť and stať sa (and others that are conjugated the same way) use the code names "irreg-stáť" and "irreg-stať" respectively, one with the accute mark, one without it. I am aware that it can be easily mistaken, but I couldn't find a better way to distinguish them, as those verbs themselves have very similar infinitives. --TomášPolonec (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@TomášPolonec: Thanks, I have indeed misread! Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 16:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)