Module talk:ne-IPA/testcases

@Kushalpok01: This syllabification seems totally wrong to me for some of them.

There are some that perhaps you are trying to represent weakened schwas in:
- ʌt̪ɾʌ should be ʌt̪.ɾʌ
- t͡sʌ.ɾit̪ɾʌ should be t͡sʌ.ɾit̪.ɾʌ
- ɾʌt͡sʌ.na should be ɾʌ.t͡sʌ.na
For the above, are these schwa dropped or weakened, or what exactly? For example, hi-IPA transcribed चरित्र as /t͡ʃə.ɾɪt̪.ɾᵊ/ because the schwa is very weak. Is it like that? In that case I think t͡sʌ.ɾit̪.ɾᶺ would be the correct transcription.
The geminate is handled incorrectly, it should straddle the syllable boundary
- sʌmː.ʌ should be sʌm.mʌ
- t͡sʌpː.ʌl should be t͡sʌp.pʌl
- pʌkː.a should be pʌk.ka