Citations:vrddhied
Appearance
1851 | 1956 1977 1999 |
||||||
ME « | 15th c. | 16th c. | 17th c. | 18th c. | 19th c. | 20th c. | 21st c. |
- 1851, Adalbert Kuhn, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht [etc.], page 190:
- They differ from the vṛddhied formations involving the other suffixes only in that they take the nom. -s, which is the normal practice with stems in occlusives.
- 1956, KRATYLOS. Kritisches Berichts- und Rezensionsorgan für Indogermanische Allgemeine, Wiesbaden: Ludwig Reichert Verlag, ISSN 0023-4567, page 72:
- But to my mind “carry-acquire-rule” can hardly represent one root, and xšāyāθiya- is not from kṣā- but the vrddhied derivative of kšayant-.
- 1977, Acta Iranica, Encyclopédie permanente des Études Iraniennes, Volume VII, BRILL, →ISBN, page 94:
- If this *sū- also served as the basis of a derivative *sū-ro-, *su-ro- (“connected with the wife”?), than a vṛddhied derivative *seuro-, seuriyo-, describing men connected via the wife, may have been the source of OSC šurь, šurinъ, Russ. šurin “brother of a wife, brother-in-law”.
- 1999, Douglas Q. Adams, A dictionary of Tocharian B, Rodopi, →ISBN, page 506:
- Compare the non-vṛddhied A śiśäk "lion" with it's vṛddhied B counterpart ṣecake.