2011, Robert Gifford, The Dragons of Inaction, American Psychologist 66(4):290-302:
Social comparison probably is related to social risk. Mistrust must often underlie denial. Technosalvation might well presuppose perceived program inadequacy.
2012, James W. Haag, Gregory R. Peterson, Michael L. Spezio, The Routledge Companion to Religion and Science, Routledge (→ISBN), page 579:
First disseminated through science fiction, these promises of transhumanist technosalvation have become the principal public narratives surrounding brain-machine interfaces.
2018, Susan Clayton, Christie Manning, Psychology and Climate Change, Academic Press (→ISBN), page 173:
In terms of the barriers taxonomy initially presented by Gifford (2011), this category encompasses mistrust, denial, reactance, technosalvation, suprahuman control, lack of self-efficacy, system justification, optimism bias, and confirmation bias.
2019, Elina Närvänen, Nina Mesiranta, Malla Mattila, Anna Heikkinen, Food Waste Management: Solving the Wicked Problem, Springer Nature (→ISBN), page 194:
The reliance upon “technosalvation” is a form of cognitive dissonance, allowing us to continue with the status quo while avoiding personal responsibility (Gifford 2011; Lorenzoni et al. 2007).
