Citations:pulled-to-publish
Appearance
English citations of pulled-to-publish
Adjective: "(of a work of fiction) previously published as fan fiction before being commercially released"
[edit]2013 2015 2016 2017 | |||||||
ME « | 15th c. | 16th c. | 17th c. | 18th c. | 19th c. | 20th c. | 21st c. |
- 2013 January 6, Christina Wilder, “Why Pulled-to-Publish Fanfiction Does Not Work”, in The Book Lantern[1]:
- There’s a new get-rich-quick scheme at play, and it’s called pulled to publish fanfiction.
- 2015, Katharine E. McCain, "Canon Vs. 'Fanon': Genre Devices In Contemporary Fanfiction", thesis submitted to Georgetown University, page 4:
- […] and, as I will argue in Chapter Five, these differ significantly from the pulled-to-publish (P2P) novels like After and Fifty Shades of Grey.
- 2016, Monica Flegel & Jenny Roth, "Writing a New Text: The Role of Cyberculture in Fanfiction Writers’ Transition to 'Legitimate' Publishing", Contemporary Women's Writing, Volume 10, Issue 2, July 2016:
- In answer to questions about fan policing of pulled-to-publish fanfiction, she notes: […]
- 2017, Kacey Whalen, "A Consumption of Gay Men: Navigating the Shifting Boundaries of M/M Romantic Readership", thesis submitted to DePaul University, page 10:
- While not all or even most m/m romance novels are pulled-to-publish stories, the close connection between slash fiction and m/m romance allows us to see how each genre might inform each other as readers and authors begin to cross over.