1984, James Phillip McAuley, Quadrant - Volume 28, page 55:
The general culture has greeted first shoots of neofeminism with sighs of relief, since in its concession of sex differences neofeminism seems more rational and realistic than feminism.
1999 October 15, Aidan Nichols, Christendom Awake: On Re-Energising the Church in Culture, W.B. Eerdmans, →ISBN, →OL, page 118:
A characteristic speculative development in neofeminism is the notion of a specifically female nature, of a radical fissure, then, within the human race creative effectively of a duality of species, and so of an absolute difference in origin between men and women.
2021 January 10, Laura Cappelle, “With ‘I Hate Men,’ a French Feminist Touches a Nerve”, in The New York Times[1]:
In an opinion piece for the newspaper Le Journal du Dimanche, the philosopher Élisabeth Badinter criticized the “binary thinking” of “belligerent neofeminism.”
1989, Beatrice Bruteau, “The Unknown Goddess”, in Shirley J. Nicholson, editor, The Goddess Re-Awakening: The Feminine Principle Today, Quest Books, →ISBN, →OL, pages 76–77:
The first thing that needs to be clearly understood whenever one speaks of the new feminine consciousness, or neofeminism, is that it is not a consciousness or a movement for women alone but for women and men together. It is precisely separation and exclusivism that neofeminism rejects.
2005 March 30, Celeste Hutchins with Christi Denton, “What is Neofeminism?”, in Dawn Keetley, John Pettegrew, editors, Public Women, Public Words: A Documentary History of American Feminism, volume 3, Rowman & Littlefield, →ISBN, →OL, page 496:
But what's the point in arguing about it, when with the wave of the magic prefix wand, post-feminism becomes past tense, and a new movement (re)emerges. Neofeminism. Because post-feminism sucked.
2008 January 1, Imad Fawzi Shueibi, How a Female Thinks[2], Trafford Publishing, →ISBN, →OL:
It also goes beyond the neofeminism (postmodernist feminism) which is characterized by criticizing the masculine intellectual individualism (pallogocentrism) and rejecting the male's centralism that was no more than a continuity of the European tendency for centrality.
2011 March 28, Alistair Fox, Jane Campion: Authorship and Personal Cinema, Indiana University Press, →ISBN, →OL, page 112:
[…] its focus on self-realization achieved through a liberated eroticism answered to the zeitgeist, which, as Hilary Radner has shown, from the late 1980s onward has produced a distinct line of films informed by the values of “neo-feminism,” a doctrine of self-fulfillment advocated by, among others, Helen Gurley Brown, the former editor of Cosmopolitan.
