1984 April 14, David Sonenschein, “'Sane' and 'Just'?”, in Gay Community News, page 5:
While we have now many discussion [sic] of man-boy "love," […] the lesbian and gay press still needs to acknowledge the existence and value of woman-girl "love" — korephiles, bisexual women, and heterosexual women who do or can have sensual relations with girls.
> Now another one for you: What is a Korephile? Oh, I don’t know, I think that’s way above my head, cause I’m a big stupid bigoted hypocrit. >:^P “Kore” means “maiden”, or “young girl”, so “Korephile” would mean, roughly, “girl-lover”. I suppose you’re going to use this to advance another long-winded explanation of why pedophilia is good and okay?
1998 October 20th, [original post by “Nick” (username) seemingly deleted, later quoted by]: “danny or doreen dong” (username), “Re: Pedophilia #1” (same date) in alt.feminism, Usenet:
> > Which means that if you have […] sex with an 8-year-old boy or an 8-year-old girl, regardless of your own sex, you are still a pederast. […] > So, you would define an active korephile (lesbian pedophile) as a pederast?
13 December 1998, Nippophile, “Re: New proposal: alt.binaries.pictures.korephile.nonude”, in alt.config[1] (Usenet):
That off course does not mean that pedophiles and korephiles are not welcome in ab.aoi, but pictures of pre-pubescent girls are, unless part of a mixed series.
1999 December?, [original post by “Nick” (username) seemingly deleted, later quoted by]: “NM” (username), “Re: abusers = ‘cured’?!” (1999 December 12th) in alt.activism.youth-rights, Usenet:
> I don’t think that the dictionary publishers want to acknowledge pedosexuality. You don’t see an old word ‘korephile’ in there either. (lesbian pedophile)
01 February 2001, *sunbird*, “Re: Casual sex: don't do it!”, in soc.singles[2] (Usenet):
I'd rather be a gynophile, or even better a korephile.
