Citations:gender-critical
Appearance
English citations of gender-critical and gender critical
Adjective: “relating to gender-critical feminism”
[edit]- 2013 August 2, Elizabeth Hungerford, “Sex Is Not Gender”, in CounterPunch[1], retrieved December 6, 2022:
- As a gender critical feminist and an attorney, I have been analyzing the legal and medical conflation of gender with sex for years.
- 2014 August 6, Juliet Jacques, “On the ‘Dispute’ Between Radical Feminism and Trans People”, in New Statesmen[2], London, retrieved December 6, 2022:
- I don’t believe that all, or even most, ‘gender-critical’ editorials genuinely set out to make our lives harder: more that their writers don’t realise the impact they can have in the structure outlined above.
- 2016, Grace Franki & Andy Zephyr, "The ethics debate", Honi Soit (University of Sydney), Semester 1, Week 3 (2016), page 15:
- For a topic with a reasonably broad scope, the entire discussion repeatedly boiled down to trans women and "gender critical" feminists.
- 2016 June 29, Polly Anna Rocha, “Pride & Prejudice”, in San Antonio Current[3], San Antonio, Texas: Euclid Media Group, retrieved December 6, 2022, page 32:
- This sort of mistreatment reflects the ideologies of trans-exclusionary radical feminism, popular amongst certain gender-critical lesbian groups.
- 2018 October 30, Anna Fazackerley, “UK Universities Struggle to Deal with ‘Toxic’ Trans Rights Row”, in The Guardian[4], London, retrieved December 6, 2022:
- Selina Todd, professor of modern history at Oxford University, agrees. Recently one delegate cancelled their place at a humanities conference she was due to speak at when they saw her name on the agenda. “It was because the person was concerned that ‘transphobic’ views would be expressed. I assume that this referred to my gender-critical stance.”
- 2018, Esther Betts, "I regret my tactics at a trans rights protest. Here’s why", The Guardian, 26 November 2018:
- I no longer think that gender-critical voices should be simply censored.
- 2019, Emily Johnson & Stephanie Zhang, "Academic Freedom to Hate", Farrago, Edition 7 (November 2019), page 15:
- When these arguments are questioned, gender-critical feminists like Lawford-Smith say that any attacks on their ideologies are attacks on all cis women.
- 2019, "In Britain, saying sex is immutable can be a sackable offence | Britain | The Economist", The Economist, 20 December 2019:
- Another explosion in the gender wars went off on December 18th, when an employment tribunal in London ruled that stating “gender-critical” beliefs—for instance, that the words “man” and “woman” properly refer to males and females rather than to anyone who identifies as such—are a legitimate reason to lose one’s job.
- 2019, Gaby Hinsliff, "Maya Forstater’s case was about protected beliefs, not trans rights", The Guardian, 22 December 2019:
- Forstater’s allies are justified in worrying that debate is being chilled by a small minority of trans activists resorting to aggressive threats online and physical intimidation of gender-critical feminists in real life.
- 2020 January 3, Damien Gayle, “After Tribunal’s Ethical Veganism Ruling, What Is a Protected Belief?”, in The Guardian[6], London, retrieved December 6, 2022:
- Maya Forstater, a former researcher and writer for a thinktank, is likely to appeal against a ruling that her gender-critical feminist beliefs could not be protected, Chilton suggested.
- 2020, "Stupefied!", The Varsitarian (University of Santo Tomas), 9 January 2020, page 4:
- 2020, Anna Fazackerley, "Sacked or silenced: academics say they are blocked from exploring trans issues, The Guardian, 14 January 2010:
- Dr Kath Murray, a research associate in criminology at Edinburgh University, says there are many obstacles to organising gender-critical events on women’s rights.
- 2020, Camilla Turner, "Oxford college accused of closing down free speech over transgender event rules", The Telegraph, 21 January 2020:
- Academics have accused Merton College of adopting a “draconian” stance towards free speech by “suppressing gender-critical thought”.