Jump to content

Citations:evilution

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary

English citations of evilution

Noun: "(informal, pejorative, often humorous) evolutionary theory viewed as something detrimental to human society"

[edit]
1993 1994 1996 1997 2001 2002 2003 2005
ME « 15th c. 16th c. 17th c. 18th c. 19th c. 20th c. 21st c.
  • 1993 August 29, Frank Reid, “Re: 4 more Barney (end)”, in alt.music.filk[1] (Usenet):
    Actually, dinosaurs are an atheist plot to get kids to believe in evilution.
  • 1994 November 4, Benjamin K Shisler, “Re: LOSE YOUR BRAIN THE XTIAN WAY! (Offensive!)”, in alt.atheism.satire[2] (Usenet):
    Is this similar to how God put fossils of dinosaurs as a test to find who would be unfaithful and believe in evilution?
  • 1996 October 5, Paul Myers, “Re: The eloquent words of Immanuel Velikovsky [really: more on Carboniferous bones]”, in talk.origins[3] (Usenet):
    Ooops, no, he can't use alcohol, either. That's produced by fermentation, which is studied and optimized by evil biologists and chemists, almost all of whom believe in evilution.
  • 1997 May 2, Mark Smith, “Re: A Questions for the Atheist (shamelessly cross-posted to alt.bible.prophecy)”, in alt.bible.prophecy[4] (Usenet):
    If a scientist tells you that you evalved[sic] from a worm, you believe this guy without questioning. Hey, it's science! But there are so many holes in evilution and it can not be proven.
  • 2001 March 7, Zaph'enath, “Re: where's the evolutionary discussion?”, in talk.origins[5] (Usenet):
    As a result, threads would be increasingly dominated by those whose style of argumentation tends to emotional appeals, arguments from personal incredulity, and arguments from fear ("you'll go to heLL if you believe in evilution").
  • 2002 May 9, Loren, “Re: Tradition and Scripture”, in soc.religion.christian[6] (Usenet):
    I don't care if every man, woman and child, from the first conscious ape (if you believe in evilution) to the last man standing, if they all believe that "X" is wrong and "Y" is right, it is still a relative ethic.
  • 2003 August 4, Morbert, “Creationism is better”, in talk.origins[7] (Usenet):
    Most people today think evilution is true. But every one knows it is false. The proof of creationism is abundant.
  • 2003 November 22, Wakboth, “When (if ever) did Creationist posters last make sense?”, in talk.origins[8] (Usenet):
    In the time I've been following this newsgroup, there have been bizarre rants from Man Older Than Coal, a variety of one-shot posters with strip-mined quotes and/or crazy misrepresentations of ToE, religious ranters who try to show that "belief in evilution" destroys our morality, and a spate of ID advocates whose logic appears to be not just circular, but actually spiraling (ie. inwards-turning and leading to nowhere in circles).
  • 2005 October 2, Gene Ward Smith, “Re: seismic shift in the market”, in rec.arts.sf.written[9] (Usenet):
    Historians are ignorant morons, just like those durned astonomers[sic] who claim the Earth is not at the center of the universe, or those smarty-pants biologists who believe in evilution.