Citations:early Showa

English citations of early Showa

• 2003, Journal of Japanese Trade & Industry‎^[1], volume 22, Japan Economic Foundation, page 174:

  The form that “national polity” took during the early Showa era before World War II (1926–45) was actually, in Fukuzawa’s terms, merely a “constitution.”

• 2004, Stuart Picken, chapter 3, in Sourcebook in Shinto: Selected Documents‎^[2], Westport: Praeger Publishers, →ISBN, page 87:

  The controversial period of State Shinto covers three modern imperial eras, namely Meiji (1868–1912), Taisho (1912–1926), and early Showa (1926–1945).

• 2005, J. Charles Schencking, Making Waves: Politics, Propaganda, and the Emergence of the Imperial Japanese Navy, 1868–1922‎^[3], Stanford: Stanford University Press, →ISBN, page 7:

  The army, however, held no monopoly on political involvement in Meiji-Taishō and early Shōwa (1926–45) Japan.

• 2008, Akashi Yōji, chapter 1, in Yōji Akashi, Mako Yoshimura, editors, New Perspectives on the Japanese Occupation in Malaya and Singapore, 1941–1945‎^[4], Singapore: NUS Press, →ISBN, page 21:

  It was the sole organisation in the Taisho (1912–26) and early Showa (1926–45) periods devoted to the studies of the South Seas region, and played an important role in disseminating information about the region and in training the manpower necessary for Japanese business operations in Nanyo.

• 2015, Miya Mizuta, chapter 17, in Sandy Isenstadt, Margaret Maile Petty, Dietrich Neumann, editors, Cities of Light: Two Centuries of Urban Illumination‎^[5], New York: Routledge, →ISBN, page 109:

  Scholarly descriptions of Taikan's work, a masterpiece of the early Shōwa period (1926–1945), uniformly comment on the brilliance of its colors: the red bonfire-style torchlights, the green pine trees, and the white illumined flowers against the brilliant yellow luminescence of the gold-leafed backdrop.

• 2017, David Streckfuss, edited by Christoph Antons, Routledge Handbook of Asian Law‎^[6], New York: Routledge, page 378:

  We delve into some depth on the ideological foundations and the details of specific cases, because the story of lèse-majesté in Japan has yet to be told in Japanese or English, especially in the Taishō (1912–26) and early Shōwa (1926–45) periods.

• 2019, Ng Wai-ming, Imagining China in Tokugawa Japan: Legends, Classics, and Historical Terms‎^[7], part II, New York: Suny Press, →ISBN, page 90:

  For instance, in the early Shōwa period (1926–45), conservative scholars, such as Shionoya On (1878–1962) and Nakamura Kyūshirō (1874–1961), attacked the Mencian theory of revolution.