Citations:cdesign proponentsist

English citations of cdesign proponentsist

creationist

							2005 2006 2007 2008 2010 2011 2012 2016 2024
ME «	15th c.	16th c.	17th c.	18th c.	19th c.	20th c.	21st c.

• 2005 November 7, Nick Matzke, “Missing link: “cdesign proponentsists””, in The Panda's Thumb‎^[1], archived from the original on 2012-10-28:

  The amazing beast, “cdesign proponentsists” was discovered directly above strata containing the well-known and ubiquitous species “creationists”. Previous research by Forrest had dated the layer the missing link was found in to the latter half of 1987.

• 2005 December 21, B. Richardson, “Re: Discovery Institute Responds”, in talk.origins‎^[2] (Usenet), message-ID <43a8d1e9-robomod@ediacara.org>:

  Just tell them you're a cdesign proponentsist.

• 2006 July 2, Raging Bee, “Larry’s Solo Act (comment)”, in Dispatches from the Creation Wars‎^[3], retrieved 2012-10-28:

  Because the entire “cdesign proponentsist” movement is, at its root, driven by the inability of certain people to let go of their prejudices, mistaken understandings, and just plain obsolete worldviews.

• 2007 November 30, Mark, “Disingenuous? Stupid? Both?”, in Denialism Blog‎^[4], retrieved 2012-10-28:

  (Never trust a cdesign proponentsist on a quote):

• 2007 December 15, David Marjanovi?, “Billy Dembski, pious and deluded (comment)”, in Pharyngula‎^[5], retrieved 2012-10-28:

  On the “Wells lies. Again.” thread a few months ago, I pointed out to the cdesign proponentsist that the existence of Stupid Design falsified ID.

• 2008 February 18, Sparky, “What's that appendix for, anyway?”, in Discount Thoughts‎^[6], retrieved 2012-10-28:

  Famous cdesign proponentsist Dembski brought it up again recently in his list of ID "predictions" (click for epic fail).

• 2008 March 4, Richard Clayton, “Re: WingNutDaily: I can't wait to be 'Expelled'”, in talk.origins‎^[7] (Usenet), message-ID <99a94226-b012-4f58-8629-bc540a1d4a5b@p73g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>:

  Funny how cdesign proponentsists like to apply terms like "doctrinaire" and "zealots" to scientists.

• 2010 October 3, Athel Cornish-Bowden, “Re: A Query for All”, in talk.origins‎^[8] (Usenet), message-ID <8gru21Fne2U1@mid.individual.net>:

  You're forgetting that cdesign proponentsists are purely scientific in their approach. Nothing religious about it.

• 2011 April 8, Frank J, “Re: Warning to the NON-Christians in this group”, in alt.politics.homosexuality‎^[9] (Usenet), message-ID <7856598f-1cae-401b-9f88-9e658121fb4d@x3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>:

  But you must not like him because he appointed Judge Jones, who ruled against the cdesign proponentsists, calling their nonsense "breathtaking inanity."

• 2012 June 27, Kickin' Ass, Takin' Names, “Texas GOTP wants to ban thinking in schools. This is NOT a joke.”, in alt.politics‎^[10] (Usenet), message-ID <ndpmu7tb7env4ul8oi2s919dumgnh4f7kf@6ax.com>:

  Heck, it’s not even the subtle shift from an open “Cdesign proponentsist” agenda to a pseudo-neutral call for students to be able to answer “God Did It” on a biology test “without fear of retribution or discrimination,” or even the plan to base all US History lessons on the art of John McNaughton.

• 2016 February 24, Matthew Herron, “Changing into my old genes: Betül Kaçar’s molecular paleontology”, in Fierce Roller‎^[11], retrieved 2019-09-03:

  I’ve written about Dr. Kaçar’s research, and the Discovery Institute’s bizarre interpretations, before, and I won’t be surprised if the cdesign proponentsists feel compelled to respond again.

• 2024 February 3, jillery, “Re:Masterclass”, in talk.origins‎^[12] (Usenet):

  Even if that is so, then you and other cdesign proponentsists are in for a rude shock. The fossil record demonstrates abundant and often abrupt change.