[…] acquiescence when Muslims are harassed, and, since American Muslims have been the subject of scapegoating, this case symbolizes our struggle to earn our civil rights through legal channels and defeat anti-semitism against Muslims.
2008, Garth Hewitt, Bethlehem speaks: voices from the little town cry out, page 76:
Anti-Arab and Muslim racism Right now also, throughout the world, we see a great rise of a new kind of anti-Semitism against Muslims - it is anti-Arab, anti-Muslim Islamophobia, which manifests itself in very ugly […]
Reflective and autobiographical, it shows how connections between Islam and terrorism were invented. It also points out the dangers inherent in such an exercise: the rise of a new anti-Semitism against Muslims, which is already visible not […]
2002 laon, The post-Kaufmann Nietzsche Group: humanities.music.composers.wagner link
...His position against Christianity is primarily grounded in anti-Semitism... ...Nietzsche's writing on Jews (and Christianity) not only follows the "classic antisemitic (as well as misogynistic) language" of the leading anti-Christian antisemites of the day... Nietzsche follows both of those two anti-Christian antisemites in falsely giving the passage an antisemitic meaning...
2011, Imam Warith-Deen Umar, Yahvehism: The Religion of Prophet Moses and His People, the Ancient Hebrews
[…] the major Semitic religions, Islam, Judaism Christianity […], […] Here is validation that it is a misnomer and misidentification to consider anti-Semitic or anti-Semitism to mean anti-Judaism or Jew […]
2024 May 14, Yonat Shimron, Religion News[1], archived from the original on 2024-09-21:
Trachtenberg was part of a group of scholars who drafted an alternative definition of antisemitism presented in 2021 called the Jerusalem Declaration. That declaration recognizes that antisemitism and anti-Zionism are “categorically different.” [...] The 1,200 Jewish professors in their statement explicitly refer to this and another definition, the Nexus Document, as better alternatives. “By stifling criticism of Israel, the IHRA definition hardens the dangerous notion that Jewish identity is inextricably linked to every decision of Israel’s government,” the professors’ statement says. “Far from combating antisemitism, this dynamic promises to amplify the real threats Jewish Americans already face.”
certain anti-Israel speech seen as a form of anti-Semitism
2013 January 27, Robert S. Wistrich, The Times of Israel[2], archived from the original on 2024-09-29, The Blogs:
The anti-Zionists, in their inflammatory, delegitimizing rhetoric, have branded Israel as a corrupt nation of callous baby-killers, colonialist-racist serial violators of human rights, and perpetrators of “genocide” against the Palestinians. [...] I have explored the anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist aspect of this campaign in two of my most recent books – “A Lethal Obsession” (2010) and “From Ambivalence to Betrayal” (2012). In those works I pointed out that calls for the destruction of Israel by Iran or by Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, or the Muslim Brotherhood, represent a contemporary mode of genocidal anti-Semitism.
2014 June 10, Jeff Wallenfeldt and Michael Berenbaum, “anti-Semitism”, in Encyclopaedia Britannica[3], archived from the original on 2024-11-13:
In 2004 then Israeli cabinet minister and one-time Soviet human rights activist Natan Sharansky suggested three markers to delineate the boundary between legitimate criticism and anti-Semitism. Under his “3D test,” when one of these elements was detectable, the line had been crossed: double standards (judging Israel by one standard and all other countries by another), delegitimization (the conclusion that Israel had no right to exist), or demonization (regarding the Israeli state not merely as wrongheaded or mistaken but as a demonic force in the contemporary world).
2016 May 26, “Working definition of antisemitism”, in International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance[4], archived from the original on 2024-10-30:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. [...] Contemporary examples of antisemitism [...] could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: [...] Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
