1987, Severen L. Schaeffer, Instinctive Nutrition, →ISBN, page 120:
Anopsology is not medicine since it makes no use of diagnoses, chemical products or technical expedients.
1995 May 5, Frank Dunn, “Raw Food - anopsology”, in rec.food.veg[1] (Usenet):
I just started out on raw food after reading some articles on the www regarding anopsology and instinctotherapy. See the address below.
2001 September 25, @unknownsite, “Re: germs as cause of disease”, in humanities.philosophy.objectivism[2] (Usenet):
Guy-Claude Burger has some fascinating theories connected with anopsology. Among them, bacteria and viruses are used by the body, much like Tilden wrote. […]Anopsology is "instinctive eating". People who are into this sort of thing are "instinctos". Of course there is no such thing as instinct. […]Anopsology has been accused of advocating gluttony, which is supposed to be almost the ultimate dietary sin.
2005 February 18, Jerry Story, “Re: What's wrong with hedonism?”, in humanities.philosophy.objectivism[3] (Usenet):
Also there is the subject of anopsology and the distinction between "original" food and food changed by "culinary artifice". The anopsologists have the theory that the sense of taste works more reliably on the former than on the latter.
2013, Peter Baofu, The Future of Post-Human Culinary Art, →ISBN:
Good examples of raw animal food diets include the Primal Diet, Anopsology (otherwise known as 'Instinctive Eating' or 'Instincto'), and the Raw Paleolithic diet (otherwise known as the 'Raw Meat Diet").”
From non-durably archived sources
1997, Jean-Louis Tu, “One Man's Meat Is Another Woah-man's Poison”, in Beyond Vegetarianism :
The official Un-consensus on which toxic foods to avoid, from Anopsology to Zen Macrobiotics
In fact, a central tenet of anopsology is that foods should never be combined in any way in the same bite. And, worst of all, you must never apply heat to foods in any fashion; in this respect, anopsology differs from conventional (non-raw) Paleo diets.
