Citations:Yuanhui

English citations of Yuanhui

• 1999, 郭晓勇, 朱玉生, “河南卷”, in 中囯新兴城市‎^[1], volume 2, 新华出版社, →OCLC, page 500, column 2:

  Yuanhui district, the only district under the jurisdiction of Luohe City, realized 713 milion yuan of gross national product (GNP) in 1997, up 15.6% over 1996, ranking first in the city; its revenue increased […]

• 2010 April 26, “City vows justice in farmer's case”, in China Internet Information Center‎^[2], archived from the original on August 18, 2024‎^[3]:

  The publicity department of Yuanhui District in Luohe City of Henan Province on Saturday sent China Youth Daily a written announcement claiming the local government would uncover the truth over the confinement of Xu Lindong and punish officials responsible for the case.

• 2014 June, Liu Ran, “Ethical Enquiry into the Conditions under which Involuntary Commitment Can be Ethically Justified”, in Asian Bioethics Review‎^[4], volume 6, number 2, →DOI, →ISSN, →OCLC:

  The case of X is typical. X is a farmer in Dongwang Village, Daliu Township, Yuanhui District, Luohe City, Henan Province. From 1997 to 2003, he constantly tried to petition and to sue the Township government (shangfang) for its mistreatment of a disabled woman, Z, living in the same village.[...]In April 2010, the Yuanhui District party committee and government decided to dismiss three officials from their position because they misused their power to fabricate the certificate to prove X was suffering from a mental disorder.

• 2017 February 6, “Henan Opera attracts villagers in C China's Henan Province”, in Xiang Bo, editor, Xinhua News Agency‎^[5], archived from the original on 24 May 2021‎^[6]:

  Villagers watch Henan Opera performance in Qianyuan Village of Yuanhui District in Luohe, central China's Henan Province, Feb. 6, 2017.

• 2018, Lin Yifei, Judicial Review of Arbitration: Law and Practice in China‎^[7], Wolters Kluwer, →ISBN, →OCLC:

  Since it was unable to determine the jurisdictional arbitration institution, Luohe Municipal Yuanhui District People's Court had jurisdiction over this case.