2015 November 25, Amy Biancolli, “Pop ‘‘king’’ Michael Jackson still rules in musician’s mind”, in Times Union[1], archived from the original on 2022-08-13:
Cascio declined to comment on a class-action lawsuit, filed last year by a fan, alleging the singer didn't actually record the Cascio tracks.
2018 August 24, Sarah Marsh, “Legal battle over whether Michael Jackson songs were really by superstar”, in The Guardian[2], archived from the original on 2022-11-29:
Court documents published online read: “For purposes of the appeal, appellants [Sony] accept that Jackson did not sing all the lead vocals on the Cascio tracks. But also for the purposes of the appeal, and based on their own express pleading admissions, respondents must accept that appellants did not know that someone else was the singer.”
2022 July 7, Adam Manno, “The Bizarre War Over Michael Jackson’s (Possibly Fake) Songs”, in The Daily Beast[3], archived from the original on 2024-04-22:
At the time of their release, multiple family members spoke out against the dubious recordings, dubbed the “Cascio tracks,” because they were recorded in the New Jersey home studio of friend Eddie Cascio.
2022 August 18, Kevin Rector, “Free speech doesn’t protect Sony in dispute over Michael Jackson songs, court rules”, in Los Angeles Times[4], archived from the original on 2024-04-22:
Rumors quickly swirled that three of the songs — known as the Cascio tracks, for having purportedly been recorded in the home studio of Jackson’s friend Edward Cascio — were sung by a vocal impersonator.
