Ch'ieh-mo
Appearance
English
[edit]Etymology
[edit]From Mandarin 且末, Wade–Giles romanization: Chʻieh³-mo⁴.
Proper noun
[edit]Ch'ieh-mo
- Alternative form of Qiemo
- 1959, Kazuo Enoki, “On the Nationality of the Ephthalites”, in Sei Wada, editor, Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko[1], number 18, Minato-ku, Tokyo: Kasai Publishing & Printing Co. (Pan Pacific Press), →OCLC, page 28:
- The Liang-shu mistakes Mo 末 for Chʻieh-mo 且末 during the Han (漢). But, adjoining Po-ssŭ in the west and Po-tʻi 白題 (Balkh) in the east, it should be identified with Marw. The statement of the Liang-shu that Mo adjoins Ting-ling 丁零 or Kao-chʻê 高車 in the north is based on the misunderstanding that Mo was located at Chʻieh-mo of what is now Cherchen in Chinese Turkestan.
- 1996, Jacques Gernet, translated by J. R. Foster and Charles Hartman, A History of Chinese Civilization[2], 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press, →ISBN, →LCCN, →OCLC, page 201:
- These relations even became closer under the Liang of Nanking during the first half of the sixth century as a result of the expansion of the Tʻu-yü-hun toward the oases of Shanshan and Chʻieh-mo (the present-day Cherchen).
Translations
[edit]Qiemo — see Qiemo