Category talk:Translingual syllables
Add topicThe following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
All of these were added by User:Thecurran en masse a while ago. The discussion at Wiktionary:Beer_parlour/2017/August#घॣ (ghl̥̄) and other Devanagari "Translingual" consonant + vowel combinations covers pretty much all the reasons not to have these misleading entries. User:Wyang summed it up nicely:
|
—Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 19:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thecurran did request "Please help me to hone it or to consolidate it instead of just deleting it en masse." They could be moved to a single appendix or his userspace. —Aryaman (मुझसे बात करो) 19:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; the effort of consolidating it for the creator and moving it to userspace seems too high to be justified. Note: In the BP discussion, Wyang, Chuck Entz, and Octahedron80 also expressed clear support for deletion. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, per the discussion. Wyang (talk) 06:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete —suzukaze (t・c) 06:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. @Thecurran: In order to "decipher" individual parts of ligatures or conjuncts in scripts, such as Devanagari and other abugida alphabets and not only abugida, simple tools can be used, such as SC UniPad, which is available for free (I am not advertising, you can use other tools of your choice). It can decompose ligatures and conjuncts, Korean hangeul, etc., so that one can see, what is a group of characters made of. Devanagari is not the easiest script but I don't see the value in showing all possible combinations of all possible conjuncts. So, when I paste घॣ (ghḹ) into the editor window, I can see that it's made of characters घ (gha) and ॣ. Alternatively, the template
{{xlit}}
can be used, as I demonstrated with{{xlit|sa|घॣ}}
. The use of third party tools beyond the scope of this dictionary, though. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 06:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete 'em all. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted. Wyang (talk) 08:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
And this as well. —suzukaze (t・c) 21:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted. Wyang (talk) 08:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)