Module talk:och-pron

Baxter-Sagart formatting

It seems like the Baxter-Sagart data includes remarks that probably shouldn't be included within the IPA / / marks, such as at 居. —suzukaze (t・c) 00:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Fixed now. Wyang (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Problems at 見, 濟, etc.

@Wyang The Baxter-Sagert and Zhengzhang reconstructions sometimes have different numbers of readings. This becomes a problem at a few entries, like the second pronunciation of 見 and the pronunciations of 濟. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 19:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi Justin. Sorry for the late reply. As you saw at 見, the different OC readings can be called as BS,ZS, each consisting of reading numbers separated by +. Also possible in multicharacter words, e.g. 中國. Wyang (talk) 02:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

@Wyang: Thanks! I've updated the description at {{zh-pron}}. See if there's anything to change since I think it's a bit confusing right now. — justin(r)leung _{{ (t...) | c=› }} 05:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)