When evacuation was effected it would be “to the Great Wall”, not to the Jehol boundary. Since the Great Wall dips well into northern Hopei, an area of several thousand square miles was thus added to the territory of Manchoukuo.[...]In actual operation, the cordon sanitaire of the “demilitarized” zone was far from reciprocal. Under the terms of the Tangku Truce, Chinese armed opposition to Manchoukuo was clearly prevented.]
In 1931, ten years ago, Japan invaded Manchukuo—without warning.
1982 September 5, “Monument protest”, in Free China Weekly[3], volume XXIII, number 35, Taipei, →ISSN, →OCLC, page 1:
A group of Japanese is planning to build a monument at the foot of Mount Fuji in Japan to commemorate the establishment of Manchukuo, a puppet regime set up by the Japanese imperialists in 1932 to prepare for the invasion of China.
Manchuria in the guise of Manchukuo was now under firm Japanese control, and to it had been added the buffer province of Jehol and a security zone in northern China. The May 31 truce at T'ang-ku suggested that the Japanese might be satisfied with these gains, which more than fulfilled their stated purpose.
We might ask finally whether humanitarian intervention even exists. There is no shortage of evidence that it does. The evidence falls into two categories. The first is declarations of leaders. It is all too easy to demonstrate that virtually every resort to force is justified by elevated rhetoric about noble humanitarian intentions. Japanese counterinsurgency documents eloquently proclaim Japans intention to create an “earthly paradise” in independent Manchukuo and North China, where Japan is selflessly sacrificing blood and treasure to defend the population from the “Chinese bandits” who terrorize them.
